McDonald’s Corporation v. Simon Marketing 2002-09-16 - evidence

2002-09-16
1 min read

Key takeaway: McDonald’s Corporation and its executives knew perfectly well, in 2015, that McDonald’s Corporation and its subsidiary companies were engaging in a pattern of racketeering activity.

“MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, United States District Judge.
[…]
McDonald’s asserts seven claims against the defendants. Counts 1 and 2 are claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act against Jacobson and the other individual defendants, charging them with conducting Simon’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity and conspiring to do so.” (I emphasize)

Type of evidence: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Court: United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Original source: https://casetext.com/case/mcdonalds-corp-v-simon-marketing-inc

Click on this link to visualize the original document: 2002-09-16_mcdonalds_corporation_v_simon_marketing_evidence.pdf
#McDonald’s Corporation #Simon Marketing #RICO #Pattern of racketeering activity
Avatar

Vincent B. Le Corre

 I am the key witness and whistleblower in a major international criminal case targeting McDonald’s Corporation for decades of mass-marketing consumer fraud and cross-border money laundering. The case, registered as application 50552/22 before the European Court of Human Rights, is part of broader efforts to expose a pattern of serious misconduct affecting billions of consumers and implicating both corporate and institutional actors.
Next Article Published in French Newspaper Le Parisien

See Also

McDonald’s Corporation v. Simon Marketing 2002-09-16