McDonald’s Corporation v. Simon Marketing 2002-09-16 - evidence

2002-09-16
1 min read

Key takeaway: McDonald’s Corporation and its executives knew perfectly well, in 2015, that McDonald’s Corporation and its subsidiary companies were engaging in a pattern of racketeering activity.

“MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, United States District Judge.
[…]
McDonald’s asserts seven claims against the defendants. Counts 1 and 2 are claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act against Jacobson and the other individual defendants, charging them with conducting Simon’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity and conspiring to do so.” (I emphasize)

Type of evidence: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Court: United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Original source: https://casetext.com/case/mcdonalds-corp-v-simon-marketing-inc

Click on this link to visualize the original document: 2002-09-16_mcdonalds_corporation_v_simon_marketing_evidence.pdf
Avatar

Vincent B. Le Corre

I am the key witness and whistleblower in a major international criminal case targeting McDonald’s Corporation for decades of mass-marketing consumer fraud and cross-border money laundering.<br/><br/>The case, registered as application 50552/22 before the European Court of Human Rights, is part of broader efforts to expose a pattern of serious misconduct affecting billions of consumers and implicating both corporate and institutional actors.