Hunger Strike. Reply from French Law Professor Yves Strickler

2019-01-04
1 min read
Featured Image

Note: this email has been redacted for brevity. Check the French version of this page for the full content.

Key point: French law professor Yves Strickler didn’t disapprove the possibility for me to do a hunger strike to protest the repeated violations of my fundamental rights by France. For the record, I am now accusing McDonald’s of having corrupted French officials. It might help to explain why McDonald’s France and McDonald’s Corporation, and their accomplices, have never been indicted for serious fraud and money laundering in France.

From : Yves Strickler (French law professor)

To: Vincent B. Le Corre

[…]

The envisaged hunger strike is a possibility, but it must be stopped on time.

[…]

To gain a clearer understanding of the sequence of events in this case, I invite you to view a detailed timeline at the following link:
https://www.ECTHRwatch.org/timeline/mcdonalds/
This timeline provides a comprehensive overview of the key milestones and developments.

#Yves Strickler #Hunger strike
Avatar

Vincent B. Le Corre

 I am the key witness and whistleblower in a major international criminal case targeting McDonald’s Corporation for decades of mass-marketing consumer fraud and cross-border money laundering.<br/><br/>The case, registered as application 50552/22 before the European Court of Human Rights, is part of broader efforts to expose a pattern of serious misconduct affecting billions of consumers and implicating both corporate and institutional actors.
Next First Encounter and Immediate Suspicions of U.S. Intelligence Activity

See Also

List of individuals targeted by Article 432-1 of the French Criminal Code (to obstruct the execution of the law)
Email from Law Professor Yves Strickler - procedural contracts invented by the bar associations, jurisdictions, and legal aid offices
Email from Professor Yves Strickler, Associate Professor of Law Faculties - request for provisional admission to legal aid and summary proceedings