McDonald’s Corporation v. Simon Marketing 2002-09-16 - evidence
Key takeaway: McDonald’s Corporation and its executives knew perfectly well, in 2015, that McDonald’s Corporation and its subsidiary companies were engaging in a pattern of racketeering activity.
“MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, United States District Judge.
McDonald’s asserts seven claims against the defendants. Counts 1 and 2 are claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act against Jacobson and the other individual defendants, charging them with conducting Simon’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity and conspiring to do so.” (I emphasize)
Type of evidence: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Court: United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Original source: https://casetext.com/case/mcdonalds-corp-v-simon-marketing-inc