Reply from Constant Méheut, journalist for The New York Times

2022-05-31
1 min read
Featured Image

From: constant.meheut@nytimes.com

Subject: New York Times

Date received: 2022-05-31 at 18:24 Beijing time

To: X. (Anonymity granted by decision of the Court)

Note: the email has been redacted for privacy. Also, READ THIS: https://www.tojournalists.com/open-letters/explanations-sent-to-constant-meheut-may-25-2022/

Dear Mr. [NAME OF THE WHISTLE-BLOWER, REDACTED FOR PRIVACY],

Thank you very much for your emails. To be honest, I have to admit it’s a little bit difficult to follow and I am not sure I understand, yet, the link between everything you told me so far. I did understand, though, the “one chance out of four” fraud, but I am not sure I understand the other information you sent to me.

I am going to take the time to look at all of this in more detail, but if you could sum it all up in a few sentences, I would definitely appreciate it.

Kind regards,

Constant Méheut
The New York Times - Paris Bureau
+33 6 [Phone number, REDACTED FOR PRIVACY] / +33 1 [Phone number, REDACTED FOR PRIVACY]
@ConstantMeheut - Stories

Avatar

X.

I am a key witness, whistleblower, in the major criminal case targeting McDonald’s Corporation and their accomplices for fraud, money laundering, and corruption of foreign officials and magistrates. The European Court of Human Rights approved my request for anonymity (Rules 33 and 47 of the Rules of Court).