Reply from French Law Professor Yves Strickler

2019-01-04
1 min read

Note: this email has been redacted for brevity. Check the French version of this page for the full content.

Key point: French law professor Yves Strickler didn’t disapprove the possibility for me to do a hunger strike to protest the repeated violations of my fundamental rights by France. For the record, I am now accusing McDonald’s of having corrupted French officials. It might help to explain why McDonald’s France and McDonald’s Corporation, and their accomplices, have never been indicted for serious fraud and money laundering in France.

From : Yves Strickler

To: X. (Anonymity granted by decision of the Court)

[…]

The envisaged hunger strike is a possibility, but it must be stopped on time.

[…]

#Yves STRICKLER #Hunger strike
Avatar

X.

 I am a key witness, whistleblower, in the major criminal case targeting McDonald’s Corporation and their accomplices for fraud, money laundering, and corruption of foreign officials and magistrates. The European Court of Human Rights approved my request for anonymity (Rules 33 and 47 of the Rules of Court).
Next Reply from French law professor Yves Strickler

See Also

Reply from French Law Professor Yves Strickler