Off-the-Record Email to My Lawyer and the FBI — What Jean-Christophe Voyer Told Me in Taiyuan

Click on this link to visualize the original email: 2023-02-03_1734_plus0800_lehman-rogalski-jean-christophe-voyer-espionage-off-the-record_Redacted.pdf

From: Vincent Le Corre
Subject: [DEFINITELY OFF THE RECORD] potentially important, potentially sensitive
Date sent: February 3, 2023 at 17:34 +0800 (China Standard Time)
To: Edward Lehman, Adam Rogalski

Click on this link to visualize the original email: 2023-02-03_1734_plus0800_lehman-rogalski-jean-christophe-voyer-espionage-off-the-record_Redacted.pdf

Dear Mr. Lehman and dear Mr. Rogalski,

Mr. Lehman, truly, I hesitated a long time whether I should only say this to you, or only write to Mr. Rogalski. I will put both of you.

Once, my friend [SUBJECT # 2, FIRST NAME + LAST NAME, REDACTED] joked about extradition during dinner at our home. Except it wasn’t really a joke because given the context, it was neither funny nor within context, the context being I was a victim of a fraud. Why would McDonald’s want to extradite me? It didn’t make any sense at all! It was crazy.

When I received this police convocation later (that I’ve just forwarded you and Mr. Rogalski), it reminded me what [SUBJECT # 2, FIRST NAME, REDACTED], who knows [SUBJECT # 15, FIRST NAME, REDACTED], told me.

[SUBJECT # 2, FIRST NAME, REDACTED], [SUBJECT # 3, FIRST NAME, REDACTED], [SUBJECT # 15, FIRST NAME, REDACTED], [SUBJECT # 16, FIRST NAME, REDACTED]: http://[NGO domain redacted].org/wp-content/uploads/[file name REDACTED].pdf

I am struggling for various reasons: it’s a topic I don’t like to talk about because I think it’s dangerous to even think about this topic.

Espionage, I guess by definition someone is guilty until proven innocent.

Let’s try to work to get this case over quickly.

I don’t want to talk about my friends from Church. I want to talk about what a Frenchman once told me here in Taiyuan.

It’s him:

https://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/member120804.htm

Jean-Christophe Voyer. I attach a picture of him to this email (the one from this website).

I have to check the date but it was before I contact you, before July 2022 for sure… anyway, once, he told me about this McDonald’s case that they (the French government) clearly messed up, and that they were going to ask me to sign some papers and that **it was going to stay between us and he made a gesture with his hand pointing at a table we, some expats here, including a couple of French people, used to seat. I had talked about this story before to them.

Does he know something I don’t know? Did he expect me to answer something? What makes him think that France would want me to sign what I interpret to be a NDA? I don’t know.

You see, to say that the French government messed up, yes, definitely if Ms. Belloubet lodged a criminal complaint against me and later they realized I was actually right, they definitely messed up. Because if it’s not this, it means France is covering up a major case of fraud and money laundering while they should actually alert their European counterparts since the fraud happened in other countries. This part of what this Frenchman said doesn’t shock me.

The part about they will ask me to sign a non-disclosure agreement, it doesn’t shock me in the sense that it can be his imagination or educated guess. No problem.

But the part that it was going to stay between us, clearly implied that I shouldn’t talk to anybody else, this is not normal. I am sorry but it’s not normal.

Also, I remember now, another thing he mentioned was the reason, that the French government can’t let McDonald’s go bankrupt because it would affect too many people.

So, of course, as you can guess, it’s potentially a sensitive topic since this guy is supposed to be a professor of French literature at Shanxi University. How would he know this? Why would he tell me this?

Also, I submitted my SEC complaint on “Submission Number 16685-469-065-055 was submitted on Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 12:51:36 PM EST” see screenshot attached to this email (“Screenshot 2023-02-03 at 16.36.06.png”) and next day on November 16, 2022, this Frenchman makes contact with me trying to mention the McDonald’s story (see attached file IMG_6739.jpg) even though we hadn’t talked for a long time. Maybe a coincidence, but what he had said that night we met in person, it’s just too weird, too unusual… why would he tell me that it would have to stay between us?

Mr. Rogalski, what’s going on exactly? Do you know anything? I am under the impression that I am not being told everything about this case.

Shall I send more explanations and details about unusual things and/or comments some other friends made regarding this McDonald’s case?

I think we all agree it’s an unusual case. It’s not everyday a victim turned whistleblower, key witness, accuses one of the biggest food corporation in the world of actually being a criminal entity. And facts are facts.

Yes, I feel some people seem to know things I don’t know.

Me, I want to mind my own business. I don’t need to know everything.

Mr. Rogalski, but I wish some people from the FBI and/or DoJ and/or State Department would communicate with me and not leave me totally in the dark.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Vincent Le Corre

Attachments

The email attached three files, in the order they were attached:

1. Screenshot of my SEC whistleblower-complaint submission confirmation, referenced in the email above.

2. Screenshot of the message from Jean-Christophe Voyer the day after my SEC submission, referenced in the email above.

3. The photograph of Jean-Christophe Voyer from his translatorscafe.com profile, referenced in the email above.

Click on this link to visualize the original email: 2023-02-03_1734_plus0800_lehman-rogalski-jean-christophe-voyer-espionage-off-the-record_Redacted.pdf